In Mexico, the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation ruled by majority vote that there is no conflict of legal precedent limiting the legitimate interest of civil society organizations in filing injunctions regarding human rights. The ruling prevents a serious setback in access to environmental and climate justice in the country, confirming that these organizations can continue to defend the right to a healthy environment.

 

This is a victory for strategic litigation in Mexico, including climate litigation, as the decision guarantees progressivity in judicial criteria regarding legitimate interest and favors the active participation of organizations that defend the environment.

 

The legitimate interest in defending diffuse and collective rights, especially in environmental matters, must be interpreted broadly because environmental damage can extend beyond the place where it occurs due to the interconnectedness of ecosystems. Thus, guaranteeing access to justice implies the standing of individuals and entities that do not even reside in the territory where the damage occurs.

 

Although organizations celebrated the achievement, they reiterated their demand for transparency, public dialogue, and vigilance against any attempt to restrict citizen participation in the country.

 

More information here .